My response to a video "There are a few good nuggets in here, but there is also a lot of idealistic vagueness that nearly submerges those nuggets. I think there are specific things that the movement does want, or at least that *I* think could be solutions. Number one is the changing legal structure of the corporation. A corporation is not a person, and under the current legal structure, a corporation is granted all the rights of citizenship with none of the responsibilities."
Which elicited: @DocSquat This video is trying to show you, in particular, that there's a bigger picture that you're not seeing. In the system the way it should be, it wouldn't matter whether a corporation is considered a person or not. ----beauxq 9 hours ago
@beauxq Oh my god! Thank you for revealing my blindness, I am still reeling from the lightning bolt of truth that has landed upon my consciousness from your wisdom. I will immediately sell all my worldly possessions, and not send worthless money, but shall buy a tanker of soup and have it delivered to your tent. I am sure you will use it wisely.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Of course, I misspoke - a corporation does have some responsibilities - to follow the law. There is also a misplaced "the" in "the changing legal structure" should be "changing the legal structure." oh bother.
ReplyDelete